Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Distractions

First, this game. I thought it would probably work as well with Rawls' 'Political Liberalism', but maybe not.



"They differ from citizens holding the first two views in our model case in having no fully (as opposed to partially) comprehensive doctrine within which they see all values and virtues as being more or less systematically ordered."

Second, this news story (via). I'm slightly worried about the state the amputated leg was in if it was being stored in a device for smoking meat rather than, say, a freezer.

No comments: